Mosher v. Philips
Mosher v. Philips
Opinion of the Court
—Albert C. Philips was engaged in business as a real estate broker. In the course of his business he made and delivered his check, drawn on the Scandinavian American Bank of Tacoma, payable to S. H. Mosher, in the sum of $1,605, in consideration of a deed of conveyance of certain real estate by Mosher to a client or customer of Philips. Upon receipt of the check, it was handled by the payee in prompt and due course, but the bank on which it was drawn failed before it could be presented for payment, whereupon this suit was brought against the drawer, and his wife to recover $1,605 and interest. Findings, conclusions
A general demurrer was sustained to an affirmative defense to the effect that the appellants were not the debtors, hut agents of the debtor, in making and delivering the check, and.that the respondent’s right of action, if any, was against the real debtor. The assignment of error that the demurrer was improperly sustained is not now available to the appellants, for the record shows that, in the trial of the ease, they were permitted to go fully into that matter. No testimony was excluded or refused. It failed to convince the trial judge, and, upon examining it, we are of the same opinion.
The consideration of the record in all other respects justifies the findings of the trial court that there was a valuable and sufficient consideration for the cheek, that it was not paid, and that appellants, as husband and wife, are liable for the full amount sued for.
Affirmed.
Main, C. J., Holcomb, Bridges, and Mackintosh, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.