Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

James v. Cannell

Washington Supreme Court
James v. Cannell, 246 P. 304 (Wash. 1926)
139 Wash. 702; 1926 Wash. LEXIS 894
PER CURIAM.

James v. Cannell

Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING.
Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adheres to the Department opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in135 Wn. 80, 237 P. 8. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings in accordance with that opinion. *Page 703

070rehearing

On Rehearing.

Reported in 246 Pac. 304.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adheres to the Department opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 135 Wash. 80, 237 Pac. 8. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings in accordance with that opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Theresa James, Appellant, v. Claire Cannell Et Al., Respondents
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
↑