Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Washington Supreme Court, 1926

James v. Cannell

James v. Cannell
Washington Supreme Court · Decided June 2, 1926 · PER CURIAM.
246 P. 304; 139 Wash. 702; 1926 Wash. LEXIS 894

James v. Cannell

Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING.
Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adheres to the Department opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in135 Wn. 80, 237 P. 8. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings in accordance with that opinion. *Page 703

070rehearing

On Rehearing.

Reported in 246 Pac. 304.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adheres to the Department opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 135 Wash. 80, 237 Pac. 8. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings in accordance with that opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑