Washington Supreme Court, 1930

State Ex Rel. Reap v. Bell

State Ex Rel. Reap v. Bell
Washington Supreme Court · Decided June 4, 1930 · PER CURIAM.
289 P. 27; 157 Wash. 696; 1930 Wash. LEXIS 931

State Ex Rel. Reap v. Bell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is a similar case to that of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, ante p. 279, 289 Pac. 25.

In this case there are two counts in the information, alleging that relators, at different dates, in Snohomish county did unlawfully and feloniously carry about with them for the purpose of un *697 lawful sale a quantity of intoxicating liquor, other than alcohol, to wit, about five gallons of moonshine whisky.

For the reasons stated in the case of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, supra, the alternative writ is quashed and the peremptory writ denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.