Marcinko v. Consolidated Mercury Mining Co.
Marcinko v. Consolidated Mercury Mining Co.
Opinion of the Court
Respondent in his brief presents a motion to strike the statement of facts because not filed *94 within the statutory time,, which motion was argued when the case was called for hearing on the merits.
The judgment appealed from was entered on the verdict of a jury on June 25, 1932. Notice of appeal was given within thirty days, hut the statement of facts was not filed until September 28, 1932, more than ninety days after the entry of the judgment.
The motion is well taken, and under our long continued practice must be and it is granted. Perkins v. Perkins, 158 Wash. 351, 290 Pac. 855; Moss v. Moss, 163 Wash. 444, 1 P. (2d) 916; Brainard v. Miser, 165 Wash. 244, 4 P. (2d) 1097.
The errors assigned are based upon the rulings of the trial court in rejecting certain offers of proof and in dismissing the appellant’s cross-complaint. In the absence of any statement of facts, these matters cannot be inquired into, and the judgment appealed from must be and it is affirmed.
Beals, C. J., Main, Steinert, and Blake, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.