Howe v. Helmick

Washington Supreme Court
Howe v. Helmick, 53 Wash. 2d 829 (Wash. 1959)
335 P.2d 598; 1959 Wash. LEXIS 350

Howe v. Helmick

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this action for attorney fees. The defendants called for a jury. They have appealed from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict.

Their single assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. No exceptions were taken to the instructions. The evidence is in conflict.

We are able to say that the record supports the verdict, and, accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Herman Howe v. Paul C. Helmick
Status
Published