Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
42 P.3d 1278; 145 Wash. 2d 1032; 2002 Wash. LEXIS 235
(Pacific Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Wash. 2004)
- Hamm v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (Wash. 2004)
- Safeco Ins. Co. v. Woodley (Wash. 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Rebecca HAMM, Petitioner,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
Department II of the Court (Justice Owens did not sit, Justice Madsen sat in her place) considered this matter at its April 2, 2002, Motion Calendar, and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
IT IS ORDERED:
That the Petition for Review is granted and remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Winters, 144 Wash.2d 869, 31 P.3d 1164 (2001).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.