Creveling v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
Creveling v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
196 P.3d 133; 164 Wash. 2d 1024
(Pacific Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Gourley v. 180SOLUTIONS, INC. (Wash. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
David W. CREVELING, Petitioner,
Dianna Creveling, Plaintiff,
v.
THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, at its October 1, 2008, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied. The Petitioner's motion to consider additional evidence is also denied.
/s/ Gerry L. Alexander Chief JusticeCase-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.