State v. Haight
State v. Haight
217 P.3d 755; 166 Wash. 2d 1025; 2009 Wash. LEXIS 772
(Pacific Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Haight
Opinion
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Roger Lee HAIGHT, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered this matter at its September 8, 2009, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file Petition for Review is granted. The Petition for Review is granted and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Arizona v. Gant, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009).
/s/ Gerry L. Alexander Chief JusticeCase-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.