State v. Nyegaard
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. NYEGAARD (Wash. Ct. App. 2011)
- State v. Nyegaard (Wash. Ct. App. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Ryan Joseph NYEGAARD, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its September 6, 2011, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of Supreme Court No. 83525-0State of Washington v. Michael Wayne Robinson, 171 Wash.2d 292, 253 P.3d 84 (2011).
For the Court
/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICECase-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.