Sandoval v. Sullivan
Sandoval v. Sullivan
414 P.3d 581; 190 Wash. 2d 1007
(Pacific Reporter, Third Series)
Sandoval v. Sullivan
Opinion of the Court
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its April 3, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file the petition for review is denied, and therefore the petition for review is dismissed as untimely.
For the Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.