State v. Hughes
State v. Hughes
Opinion of the Court
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered the petition for review and supplemental petition for review at its November 27, 2018, Motion Calendar. The Department unanimously agreed that in light of 2018 amendments to the statutes governing legal financial obligations and this court's decision in State v. Ramirez ,
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the petition for review filed on June 29, 2018, is denied. The supplemental petition for review is granted and the case is *276remanded to the trial court to amend the judgement and sentence to strike the $200 filing fee and to state that nonrestitution legal financial obligations will not accrue interest from July 7, 2018.
For the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Washington v. Tina Marie HUGHES
- Status
- Published