Washington Territory, 1887

Savage v. Maresch

Washington Territory · Decided January 19, 1887 · Hoyt, Langford

3 Wash. Terr. 259; 21 P. 386; 1887 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 57

Counsel

Mr. II. A. Fairchild, for the Defendant in Error, and for the motion., Messrs. Sears and Aston, for the Plaintiff in Error, contra.

Concurring Opinion

Mr. Justice Langford

concurred specially as follows:—

I agree that the case ought to be affirmed on trial on the merits.

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Hoyt

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a case at law. There has been a total disregard of the provisions of rule 5 of this court, as there has been no attempt made to file or serve an assignment of error as therein required; and as appellant does not ask to be relieved from the consequences of his default, the motion to dismiss the appeal herein must be granted.

Turner, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.