UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741 | hereby certify that the annexed instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) SUSAN Y. SOONG Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California WELL CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —156) Deputy Clerk Nv. Hebe a SG 16, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

. See

(J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,734 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under

to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is . pending at this time, the FOR THE PANEL: stay is lifted. VL Z AL _ Oct 09, 2019 CLERK'S OFFICE John W. Nichols UNITED STATES Clerk of the Panel JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−156 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION ALABAMA SOUTHERN ALS 2 19−00707 Moore v. Monsanto Company et al Opposed 10/8/19 ARIZONA AZ 2 19−05065 Higgins et al v. Monsanto Company AZ 2 19−05067 McCrea et al v. Monsanto Company AZ 4 19−00428 Stubblefield v. Monsanto Company AZ 4 19−00430 Gibson et al v. Monsanto Company FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 2 19−00582 Meyers v. Monsanto Company FLM 2 19−00597 Blakeman v. Monsanto Company FLM 3 19−00947 O'Connor v. Monsanto Company FLM 3 19−00966 Adlman v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02032 Raymond v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02038 Mitchell v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02042 Norman v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02045 Robertson v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02046 Moscovita v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02061 Sherrill v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02074 Blevins v. Monsanto Company MICHIGAN WESTERN MIW 1 19−00750 Palframan et al v. Monsanto Company NEW JERSEY NJ 2 19−17801 SIMONETTI v. MONSANTO COMPANY NEW YORK EASTERN OHS 2 19−04264 Applegate v. Bayer AG OKLAHOMA WESTERN OKW 5 19−00702 Doherty v. Monsanto Company

WASHINGTON WESTERN WAW 2 19−01355 Shaw v. Monsanto Company WAW 3 19−05729 Jensen et al v. Monsanto Company WISCONSIN WESTERN WIW 3 19−00622 Paul, Howard et al v. Monsanto Company