UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ______________________________________________________________________________ ANTONIO MAYS,

Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-cv-1057-pp

ANTHONY EMANUELE, et al.,

Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL WITHOUT PREPAYING FILING FEE (DKT. NO. 84) AND DEFERING TO THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ON THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL (DKT. NO. 87) ______________________________________________________________________________

On August 24, 2020, the court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case. Dkt. Nos. 78-79. The plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal, a motion for leave to appeal without prepaying the filing fee and a copy of his prisoner trust fund account statement. Dkt. Nos. 80, 84, 85. He also has filed a motion asking the court to appoint counsel. Dkt. No. 87. This order resolves the motion to appeal without prepaying the filing fee; the court must defer to the Seventh Circuit to rule on the motion to appoint counsel. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a prisoner must pay the applicable filing fees in full for a civil case.

(b). If a prisoner does not have the money to pay the $505 filing fee in advance for an appeal, he can ask the court for permission to proceed without prepayment. For the court to consider such a request, the prisoner must complete a petition and affidavit and return it to the court, along with a certified copy of the prisoner’s trust account statement showing transactions for the prior six months.

(a)(2). The court must assess an initial partial filing fee of twenty percent of the average monthly deposits to the plaintiff’s prison account or average monthly balance in the plaintiff's prison account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal, whichever is greater.

(b)(1). After the prisoner pays the initial fee, he must make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income until he pays the filing fee in full.

(b)(2). The agency that has custody of the prisoner will collect the money and send payments to the court. There are three grounds for denying a prisoner appellant’s request to proceed without prepaying the filing fee: the prisoner has not shown that he is indigent, the prisoner filed the appeal in bad faith or the prisoner has three strikes. See

(a)(2)-(3), (g). The court finds that the plaintiff has established that he is indigent, see Celske v. Edwards,

(7th Cir. 1999) (“. . . a plaintiff who . . . was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court retains his IFP status in the court of appeals unless there is a certification of bad faith”), and that he has not accrued three strikes. That leaves only the question of whether the plaintiff filed this appeal in good faith. A district court should not apply an inappropriately high standard when making a good faith determination. Pate v. Stevens,

(7th Cir. 1998). An appeal taken in “good faith” is one that seeks review of any issue that is not frivolous, meaning that it involves “legal points arguable on their merits.” Howard v. King,

(5th Cir. 1983) (quoting Anders v. California,

(1967)); see also Coppedge v. United States,

(1962). On the other hand, an appeal taken in bad faith is one that is based on a frivolous claim, that is, a claim that no reasonable person could suppose has any merit. Lee v. Clinton,

(7th Cir. 2000). The court does not find any indication that the plaintiff did not take this appeal in good faith. Therefore, the court will grant his motion to proceed on appeal without prepaying the filing fee. The plaintiff has filed a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his notice of appeal. Dkt. No. 85. A review of this information reveals that the plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $3.09, as well as additional payments under

(b)(2). Newlin v. Helman,

(7th Cir. 1997), rev’d on other grounds by, Walker v. O’Brien,

(7th Cir. 2000) and Lee v. Clinton,

(7th Cir. 2000). The court GRANTS the plaintiff’s motion for leave to appeal without prepayment of the filing fee. Dkt. No. 85. The court ORDERS that by the end of the day on October 30, 2020, the plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court $3.09 as the initial partial filing fee in this appeal. If the plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the court of appeals may dismiss his appeal. The plaintiff must clearly identify the payment by the case name and the case number assigned in the court of appeals (Case No. 20-2653). The court also ORDERS that, after the plaintiff pays the initial partial filing fee, the agency that has custody of the plaintiff must collect from his prison trust account the balance of the filing fee ($501.91) by collecting monthly payments from the plaintiff’s prison trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month’s income credited to the plaintiff’s trust account and forwarding payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 in accordance with

(b)(2). The payments shall be clearly identified by the case name and number assigned to this action. If the plaintiff is transferred to another institution—county, state or federal—the transferring institution must forward a copy of this order along with the plaintiffs remaining balance to the receiving institution. The court will send copies of this order to the officer in charge of the agency where the inmate is confined and to PLRA Attorney, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Rm. 2722, Chicago, Illinois 60604. The court DECLINES TO RULE on the plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel. Dkt. No. 87. The Seventh Circuit has jurisdiction to rule on that motion. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 25th day of September, 2020. BY THE COURT:

Chief United States District Judge