IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

| TODD R. HESS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:19-cv-805 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Magistrate Judge Crocker Social Security, Defendant. .

ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF

(g)

Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, nodifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,

(g), and in light of the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters a judgment under sentence four of 42 U.S.C, § 405(g) reversing the Comunissioner’s decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according . to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S, 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

(1991). On remand, an ALJ will reevaluate the medical opinions of psychological functioning and explain how the RFC finding accounts for those opinions. The AL] will also reevaluate how the RFC finding accounts for Claimant's mental limitations. The

ALJ will take further action to complete the administrative record resolving the above issues, obtain additional Vocational Expert testimony if necessary, and issue a new decision.

ue" SO ORDERED this day of FEBRUARY, 2020.

Honorable Stephen Crocker United States Magistrate Judge □