IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

KERRI WOLFF, Plaintiff, v. Case No, 20-cv-412 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner Of Social Security, Defendant.

ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF

(g)

Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,

(g), and in light of the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters a judgment under sentence four of

(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer,

(1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

(1991), On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the matter to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) with instructions to proceed through the sequential disability evaluation

process as appropriate and issue a new decision. If warranted, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony.

yu SO ORDERED this 9" day of AdU/axtéfioo,

BY THE COURT:

HONORABLE JAMES D. PETERSON Chief United States District Judge