IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

ZEONA T, STEINBERGER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-cv-1065 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant,

ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF

(g)

Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,

(g), and in light of the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters a judgment under sentence four of

(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S, 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

(1991). Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to reevaluate and consider the opinions by examining physician Dr. Nevins, under the applicable regulations (

.1527c, 416.927c); further evaluate Ms. Steinberger’s subjective complaints; reassess the residual functional capacity and

determine its effects on Ms. Steinberger’s occupational base; offer Ms. Steinberger the opportunity for a new hearing; and issue a new decision. If necessary, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational evidence.

2) SO ORDERED this ¢ 7! _ day of Ma rh 2001.

BY THE COURT: Rilbaiab. Cla bb ON@®RABLE BARBARA B. CRABB United States District Judge