O'Connor, Shannon v. Saul, Andrew
O'Connor, Shannon v. Saul, Andrew
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
SHANNON C, O’CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 20-cv-887-JDP ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF
42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
Pursuant to the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters an order under sentence four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S, 292, 296 (1993); Meikonyan v. Sullivan,
501 U.S. 89, 97-98(1991). On remand, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process, reconsider the medical opinions as appropriate, and issue a new decision. If warranted, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony.
St = SO ORDERED this. 717" day of _v# VE , 2021,
feck. [Chet — Honorable James D. Peterson United States District Court Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown