O'Connor, Shannon v. Saul, Andrew
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN SHANNON C, O’CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 20-cv-887-JDP ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) Pursuant to the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters an order under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S, 292, 296 (1993); Meikonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991).
On remand, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process, reconsider the medical opinions as appropriate, and issue a new decision. If warranted, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony.
St = SO ORDERED this. 717" day of _v# VE , 2021, feck. [Chet — Honorable James D. Peterson United States District Court Judge
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.