Lull, Jason v. Saul, Andrew
Lull, Jason v. Saul, Andrew
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
JASON LULL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:21-CV-00159-JDP KILOLO KIJAKAZLI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C, § 405(g)
Pursuant to the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters an order under sentence four of 42 U.S.C, § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner’s decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms, See Shalala v. Schaefer,
509 U.S. 292, 296(1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,
501 U.S. 89, 97-98(1991). On remand, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing; proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process as appropriate; obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony if warranted; and issue a
new decision, Tn” SO ORDERED this day of _S#PTeac BER 2021,
The H6norable James D. Peterson United States District Court Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown