CN RIES SIO IEE III IRAE IIE EIR SDIE OS JE

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —91)

On December 7, 2018, the Panel transferred 75 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

. See

(J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 200 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of South Carolina. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of South Carolina and assigned to Judge Gergel. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under

to the District of South Carolina for the reasons stated in the order of December 7, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: wee, time, the □

chine Srares whe ton John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel GEE DST. A TRUE COPY S, x N\Q)\_ ATTEST: ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK = Ba I a i ee ig, BY: ada ak Shea. TANS FSD DEPUTY CLERK

ee re Ne NN ND EAD ENRON INA ND NANDA NAR Orem Bormm EAD

IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873

SCHEDULE CTO-91 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

NEW YORK SOUTHERN NYS 7 22-04234 ronan et al v. The Port Authority of New York and New ersey et al NYS 7 22—04071 Orange Water and Sewer Authority v. The 3M Company et al NEW YORK WESTERN

County of Chemung —Elmira Corning Regional Airport v. NYW 6 2206229 The 3M Company et al WISCONSIN WESTERN WIW 3 22—00292 County of Dane v. 3M Company et al