IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

CHAD LAWRENCE DUCHARME, Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. 3:23-cv-00200-sle KILOLO KIJAKAZL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF

(g)

Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Acting Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,

(g), and in light of the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon review, hereby enters a judgment under sentence four of

(g) reversing the Acting Commissioner’s decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer,

(1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

(1991). Upon remand from the court, the Appeals Council will order the ALJ to reevaluate the evidence; reassess the RFC; and obtain vocational expert evidence to assess whether there are jobs in significant numbers in the national economy that the

claimant could still do, The ALJ will also offer the claimant the opportunity for a new CH hearing, and issue a new decision.SO ORDERED this (6 day of AUGUsT2023,

BY THE “ey Lone HONORABLE STEPHEN L. COCKER United States Magistrate Judge