IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

AMY MARIE KOTH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:23-cv-00619-slc MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant,

ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C, § 405(g)

Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Acting Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,

(g), and in light of the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon review, hereby enters a judgment under sentence four of

(g) reversing the Acting Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 US. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

(1991). The parties agree that, upon remand from the court, the Appeals Council will order the AL] to reevaluate the evidence; including the opinion evidence, reassess the RFC; and obtain vocational expert evidence to assess whether there are jobs in

significant numbers in the national economy that the claimant could still do. The ALJ will also offer the claimant the opportunity for a new hearing. tH SO ORDERED this 25 day of F#!™”oq04,

HONORABLE STEPHEN L. COCKER United States Magistrate Judge