District Court, W.D. Wisconsin, 2026

Jamie Holsten v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Jamie Holsten v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Decided March 9, 2026
Jamie Holsten v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JAMIE HOLSTEN, Plaintiff, — Vv. Case No. 3:25-cv-00671-jdp FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon review, hereby enters a judgment under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner’s decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991).

Upon remand, the Appeals Council will remand the matter to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The ALJ should give further consideration to the medical source opinions and prior administrative medical findings pursuant to the provisions of 20 C.E.R. § 404.1520c. The ALJ should take further action to complete the administrative record resolving the above issues and issue a new decision.

Dated this_7 day of MAVtH | 2026 JAMESD. PETERSON Chief United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.