District Court, W.D. Wisconsin, 2026

Sarah Beil v. Pierce County, Janelle Wolf, Sgt. Eric Van Nocker, and Judge...

Sarah Beil v. Pierce County, Janelle Wolf, Sgt. Eric Van Nocker, and Judge...
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Decided May 12, 2026
Sarah Beil v. Pierce County, Janelle Wolf, Sgt. Eric Van Nocker, and Judge...

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

SARAH BEIL, Plaintiff, v. OPINION and ORDER

PIERCE COUNTY, JANELLE WOLF 26-cv-398-jdp SGT. ERIC VAN NOCKER, and JUDGE ELIZABETH ROHL, Defendants.

Plaintiff Sarah Beil, proceeding without counsel, has filed this lawsuit seeking a stay of Pierce County family court cases involving child custody, No. 2025JC46–2025JC48, contending that the state court has “lost competency to proceed due to a Structural Sequence Error and a coordinated effort to block Plaintiff’s access to the court.” Dkt. 1. Although Beil has paid the entire filing fee, this court retains the inherent authority to screen all complaints to ensure that they state a claim for which relief may be afforded and are not frivolous. Rowe v. Shake, 196 F.3d 778, 783 (7th Cir. 1999).

I will dismiss this case because this federal court cannot grant Beil the relief that she seeks; this federal court cannot intervene in ongoing state family-court proceedings. See J.B. v. Woodard, 997 F.3d 714, 722 (7th Cir. 2021) (citing Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) (federal courts cannot adjudicate claims that take aim at a contested and ongoing family court custody dispute)). Beil’s recourse is in the state-court system, whether by seeking relief in the Pierce County circuit court or in the court of appeals.

When a plaintiff proceeds without counsel, the court of appeals has cautioned against dismissing her case without giving her a chance to amend the complaint. Felton v. City of Chicago, 827 F.3d 632, 636 (7th Cir. 2016). But dismissal of this lawsuit is appropriate because there isn’t any reason to think that Beil could amend her complaint to obtain the relief that she seeks.

ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. This case is DISMISSED.

2. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case.

Entered May 12, 2026.

BY THE COURT: /s/ ________________________________________ JAMES D. PETERSON District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.