Ludlow v. Gilman
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Falkner v. Woodard (Wis. 1899)
- Sable v. Brockmeier (Minn. 1891)
- Bardeen v. Markstrum (Wis. 1885)
- Noonan v. Ilsley (Wis. 1866)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
As in the preceding case of Gilman v. Thiess et al., ante, p. 528, a question is made upon the sufficiency of the exceptions. The suit is in equity to foreclose a mortgage, and the exceptions are certainly more specific than in that case. “ The plaintiff excepts to the decision of the court upon the trial of this action upon the matters of law and equity.” The exception is confined to “ the matters of law and equity,” and no objection is taken to the facts found. The plaintiff does not seek to review the evidence. I think the exception sufficient. I think so in analogy to the rule that a general exception to a charge involving several propositions of law is good, if the charge is in all respects erroneous. Thrasher v. Tyack, 15 Wis., 256; Jones v. Osgood, 6 N. Y., 233; Caldwell v. Murphy, 11 N. Y., 416. So
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.