Wyman v. Buckstaff
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Packard v. Kinzie Avenue Heights Co. (Wis. 1900)
- Milwaukee Electric Crane Manufacturing Corp. v. Feil Manufacturing Co. (Wis. 1930)
- Williams v. Hayes (Wis. 1887)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment appealed from must be affirmed.
1. The bill of exceptions does not purport to contain all the evidence; and therefore we cannot review the finding of facts.
2. The change of the judgment, by amendment, from a judgment against the plaintiff personally to one against her de bonis testatoris, was one which it was competent for the court to make. The object was to correct a mistake in the original entry, so as to conform the record to the judgment which was in fact pronounced, and not to change such judgment. Such corrections may always be made, and are not within the principle established by Spafford v. Janesville, 15 Wis. 474.
By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.