Cahill v. Bennett
Cahill v. Bennett
Opinion of the Court
The garnishees answered through one of the members of the firm, in substance, that in the spring
It seems to us there cannot be any doubt about the right of Bennett to make the application of the money arising from this mineral to the payment of the debt due the old firm. This was in accordance with the understanding had with the debtor that it should be so applied. It is true, the price of the mineral was not agreed upon before the service of the garnishee process. But the property in the mineral had passed out of Boddilly, and he had virtually made application of the proceeds. Bennett had authority to act for both firms, to receive the mineral for the new firm and likewise the moneys arising therefrom for the old. And as there was a clear and distinct understanding with Boddilly that this mineral should be applied to discharge the debt due the old firm, that agreement and understanding should have effect.
By the Court. — The order off the circuit court is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cahill v. Bennett and others, Garnishees
- Status
- Published