For the reasons given in the opinion filed herewith in the case of Winner v. Hoyt, ante, p. 278, we must hold that the court had jurisdiction of the property and credits in the hands of the garnishees, and that the notice given was sufficient to pi'event the service on the garnishees from becoming void and of no effect from the beginning.

By the Court.— The order of the circuit court appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings according to law.