Oelberman v. Newman
Oelberman v. Newman
Opinion of the Court
By reason of the death of Judge Gilsou of the superior court the appellants are unable to procure the settlement of bills of exceptions in these causes. They therefore ask leave to dismiss their appeals, to the end that they may apply to the superior court for new trials. The motions are resisted by the respondents on the ground that new trials must be refused if applied for. We have no concern with that question. No good reason is perceived why the appellants should not be permitted to place themselves in a position to move for such new trials, without regard to the probable or even necessary results of the motions.
But the court is asked to grant these motions without allowing costs in the judgments of dismissal. We are referred to the case of Sueterlee v. Sir, 25 Wis. 357, as authority for denying costs. When the appeal was per
By the Court.— Judgment of dismissal will be entered in each action, with costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Oelberman and others v. Newman and others, Respondents Ryecraft v. Newman and others
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published