Mayer v. State
Mayer v. State
83 Wis. 339; 53 N.W. 444; 1892 Wisc. LEXIS 204
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Michels v. State (Wis. 1902)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The conviction must be affirmed. The case is ruled by the decision in Peitz v. State, 68 Wis. 538. The only difference between the two cases is that in the Peitz Case the sale was made direct to the consumer, while here it was made to a dealer. No distinction between the two cases is made by the excise law. The terms of the statute cover both oases equally.
By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.