Ryan Drug Co. v. Hvambsahl
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Heinemann Bros. v. Wendt (Wis. 1926)
- State v. City of Milwaukee (Wis. 1914)
- Ripley v. Sage Land & Improvement Co. (Wis. 1909)
- Bassick Gold Mine Co. v. Beardsley (Colo. 1910)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
No interest should have been allowed except from the time of the commencement of the action. There had been no demand for payment, and the statements of account sent by the plaintiff at regular intervals, and kept by the defendant, in which no interest was ever claimed, constituted accounts stated, binding on both parties, in the absence of fraud and mistake. Cobb v. Arundell, 26 Wis. 553; Chandler v. People's S. Bank, 61 Cal. 401.
By the Gourt.— Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.