Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Wisconsin /Cases /Wisconsin Supreme Court /

1898

263 Wisconsin Supreme Court opinions from 1898.

  • Williams v. Thrall 76 N.W. 599, (Wis. 1898)
  • Lee v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 77 N.W. 714, (Wis. 1898)
  • Vant v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 77 N.W. 713, (Wis. 1898)
  • Harp v. City of Baraboo 77 N.W. 744, (Wis. 1898)
  • Hyer v. City of Janesville 77 N.W. 729, (Wis. 1898)
  • Cunningham v. Brictson 77 N.W. 740, (Wis. 1898)
  • Anderson v. Chicago Title & Trust Co. 77 N.W. 710, (Wis. 1898)
  • Stephens v. Elver 77 N.W. 737, (Wis. 1898)
  • Schiefelbein v. Badger Paper Co. 77 N.W. 742, (Wis. 1898)
  • Zimmerman v. Bannon 77 N.W. 735, (Wis. 1898)
  • State ex rel. Barteau v. Circuit Court for Outagamie County 77 N.W. 745, (Wis. 1898)
  • Frei v. McMurdo 77 N.W. 915, (Wis. 1898)
  • Richter v. Estate of Leiby 77 N.W. 745, (Wis. 1898)
  • Ean v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 76 N.W. 329, (Wis. 1898)
  • Disch v. Timm 77 N.W. 196, (Wis. 1898)
  • Tidioute Savings Bank v. Libbey 77 N.W. 182, (Wis. 1898)
  • City of Plymouth v. Sheboygan County 77 N.W. 196, (Wis. 1898)
  • State ex rel. Schintgen v. Mayor of La Crosse 77 N.W. 167, (Wis. 1898)
  • Kuenster v. Woodhouse 77 N.W. 165, (Wis. 1898)
  • Roberts v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 77 N.W. 151, (Wis. 1898)
  • Weed & Gumaer Manufacturing Co. v. Whitcomb 77 N.W. 175, (Wis. 1898)
  • Moulton v. Williams 77 N.W. 918, (Wis. 1898)
  • Ossowski v. Wiesner 77 N.W. 184, (Wis. 1898)
  • Rowe v. Leuthold 77 N.W. 153, (Wis. 1898)
  • National Bank of Merrill v. Illinois & Wisconsin Lumber Co. 77 N.W. 185, (Wis. 1898)
  • Green v. Ashland Water Co. 77 N.W. 722, (Wis. 1898)
  • State ex rel. Alliance Elevator Co. v. Helms 77 N.W. 194, (Wis. 1898)
  • Maxwell v. Bank of New Richmond 77 N.W. 149, (Wis. 1898)
  • Rudiger v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 77 N.W. 169, (Wis. 1898)
  • Latimer v. Central Electric Co. 77 N.W. 155, (Wis. 1898)
  • Latimer v. Julius Andrae & Sons Co. 77 N.W. 1119, (Wis. 1898)
  • Benson v. City of Madison 77 N.W. 161, (Wis. 1898)
  • Bell v. Siemens & Halske Electric Co. 77 N.W. 152, (Wis. 1898)
  • Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. Rude 77 N.W. 177, (Wis. 1898)
  • Widman v. Gay 77 N.W. 918, (Wis. 1898)
  • Woodard & Stone Co. v. Milnes 77 N.W. 163, (Wis. 1898)
  • Golonbieski v. State 77 N.W. 189, (Wis. 1898)
  • Kuhl v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 77 N.W. 155, (Wis. 1898)
  • O'Connell v. Smith 76 N.W. 1116, (Wis. 1898)
  • Hinkley v. Grafton Hall 76 N.W. 1093, (Wis. 1898)
  • Parsons v. Parsons 77 N.W. 147, (Wis. 1898)
  • O'Connor v. City of Fond du Lac 76 N.W. 1116, (Wis. 1898)
  • Pritchard v. Barnes 76 N.W. 1106, (Wis. 1898)
  • Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago Railroad v. Stolze 76 N.W. 1113, (Wis. 1898)
  • Hollman v. City of Platteville 76 N.W. 1119, (Wis. 1898)
  • Mathews v. Ripley 77 N.W. 718, (Wis. 1898)
  • McMahon v. Ida Mining Co. 76 N.W. 1098, (Wis. 1898)
  • Reilly v. Howe 76 N.W. 1114, (Wis. 1898)
  • Doan v. Town of Willow Springs 76 N.W. 1104, (Wis. 1898)
  • Meyer v. Hope 77 N.W. 720, (Wis. 1898)
« Prev 1 2 3 … 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑