Duffy v. Hinkley

It does not seem advisable to discuss tbe evidence in tbis case. Tbe questions raised all relate to whether tbe findings are warranted by tbe evidence. The-record has been carefully examined. We are unable to perceive that sucb findings are against tbe clear .preponderance of tbe evidence, and therefore, by familiar rules, tbe judgment must be affirmed.

By the Gourt. — So ordered.