Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1905

Means v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court · Decided October 3, 1905 · Winslow

125 Wis. 650; 104 N.W. 815; 1905 Wisc. LEXIS 199

Cases that cite this one

26 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

Verhaalen v. State (Wis. 1928)
State v. Pettijohn (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)
State v. Yancey (Wis. 1966)
Sparkman v. State (Wis. 1965)
Fisher v. State (Tenn. 1955)
State v. Rutledge (Mo. 1954)
Barton v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1949)
Cole v. State (Okla. Crim. App. 1946)
State v. Schwartz (Minn. 1943)
State v. Keckonen (Mont. 1938)
State v. Peterson (Utah 1933)
Wise v. Commonwealth (Va. 1923)
Ephraim v. State (Fla. 1921)
Jones v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1916)
Glover v. State (Ind. 1913)
State v. Johnson (Utah 1913)
Weaver v. Territory of Arizona (Ariz. 1912)
State v. Massey (N.M. 1954)
State v. Panther (Iowa 1941)
Garrad v. State (Wis. 1927)
State v. . Griffin (N.C. 1917)
State v. Griffin (N.C. 1917)
State v. Yates (Iowa 1917)
State v. Katz (Mo. 1916)
People v. Colburn (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1914)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Winslow, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of a crime against nature under sec. 4591, Stats. 1898, committed by inducing a boy seven years of age to insert his male organ in the mouth of the plaintiff in error. Upon writ of error he claims that as the boy was incapable of penetration in the sense in which that word is used in rape, and incapable of emission, there was no crime under sec. 4591, but only an indecent assault under sec. 4591a, Stats. 1898.

We are unwilling to soil the pages of our Reports with lengthened discussion of the loathsome subject. There is sufficient authority to sustain a conviction in such a case, and, if there were none, we would feel no hesitancy in placing an authority upon the books. Reg. v. Allen, 1 Den. C. C. 364; Kelly v. People, 192 Ill. 119, 61 N. E. 425.

It is said that the boy was an accomplice, and that no con*651viction can "be sustained npon bis uncorroborated evidence. Sncb is not the law in this state. It is in the discretion of the trial court whether to direct an acquittal or not. Black v. State, 59 Wis. 471, 18 N. W. 457; Porath v. State, 90 Wis. 527, 63 N. W. 1061. Moreover, an accomplice is one who consents, and a boy of such tender years is not capable of legal consent, and hence is not an accomplice. Kelly v. People, supra; Mascolo v. Montesanto, 61 Conn. 50, 23 Atl. 714.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.