Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907

Pfister v. McGovern

Wisconsin Supreme Court · Decided September 24, 1907 · Oueiam

132 Wis. 533; 111 N.W. 1135; 1907 Wisc. LEXIS 111

Counsel

For the appellants there were briefs signed by W. D. Cor-rigan and O. M. Fritz, attorneys for McGovern, by Adolph Kanneberg, attorney for Cochems, by Charles F. Hunter, attorney for Qo'jf, and by James G. Flanders and W. J. Turner, of counsel; and the cause was argued orally by Mr. Flamders, Mr. Turner, and Mr. John J. Cook., For the respondent there was a brief by Quarries, Spence & Qucnies, Thomas M. Kearney, and Spooner & Filis, and oral argument by Charles Quarles and George Lines.

Opinion of the Court

*534Tbe following decision was filed April 30, 1907:

Pee Oueiam.

By reason of having acted as an attorney for some of tbe parties to tbis action before be became a member of tbis court, Mr. Justice TimliN was unable to participate in its consideration. Tbe other justices being equally divided in opinion, tbe order appealed from is affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied September 24, 1907,. by an equally divided court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.