Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1913

Hay v. Randles

Wisconsin Supreme Court · Decided March 11, 1913 · Maeshall

152 Wis. 632; 140 N.W. 333; 1913 Wisc. LEXIS 122

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Sterling Engineering & Construction Co. v. Berg (Wis. 1915)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Maeshall, J.

There are no questions of law for consideration on this appeal. Tbe sole question is as to whether any finding of fact, vital to tbe recovery, is contrary to tbe clear preponderance of tbe evidence. On such a matter, in general, there is little or no use of doing more than to state *633the court’s conclusion which is, here, in the negative. No valuable purpose would be served, in this very ordinary case, by discussing the evidence. Therefore, no such discussion will be indulged in.

By the Court. — The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.