Keck v. Michigan Quartz Silica Co.
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Wendt v. Starkweather (Wis. 1940)
- Wald v. Mitten (Wis. 1938)
- Foster v. Bauer (Wis. 1921)
- Ott v. Cream City Sand Co. (Wis. 1917)
- Mechanical Appliance Co. v. A. Kieckhefer Elevator Co. (Wis. 1916)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This judgment must be affirmed, because (1) it does not appear that the findings of fact of the civil court are against the clear preponderance of the evidence (Pabst B. Co. v. Milwaukee L. Co. 156 Wis. 615, 146 N. W. 879), and (2) the continued maintenance by the plaintiff of his office in the Railway Exchange Building after the passage of the resolution of November 18, 1909, was sufficient consideration for the promise contained in the resolution.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.