Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914

Deno v. Hersh

Wisconsin Supreme Court · Decided October 27, 1914 · Marshall

158 Wis. 502; 149 N.W. 145; 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 336

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

St. Norbert College Foundation, Inc. v. McCormick (Wis. 1978)
Reader v. Frank H. Applegate, Inc. (Wis. 1937)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MARSHALL, J.

The foregoing contains, it is thought, a fair statement of the facts disclosed by the evidence. It is difficult to see how any different conclusion could have been arrived at than the one complained of. When the defendant declared the contract of sale rescinded and took back the papers, and respondent accepted the situation by demanding *505back his. money, that substantially ended the sale contract by mutual agreement. That was confirmed by appellant’s surreptitiously obtaining possession of one of the keys, taking possession of the store and excluding respondent therefrom, the latter acquiescing therein by making no demand except for a return of the $50.

By the Court. — The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.