In tbis case it is held:

1. Tbat tbe sale of tbe mill at Eond du Lac was not an interstate commerce transaction, nor was it a necessary incident to tbe carrying on of such commerce.

2. Tbat tbe contract, in so far as it involved such mill, was a contract relating to property within tbe state and was void under sec. 1770b, Stats.

By the Gourt. — Judgment affirmed.