Sprout, Waldron & Co. v. Amery Mercantile Co.
Sprout, Waldron & Co. v. Amery Mercantile Co.
162 Wis. 279; 156 N.W. 158; 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 136
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Unitype Co. v. Schwittay (Wis. 1919)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In tbis case it is held:
1. Tbat tbe sale of tbe mill at Eond du Lac was not an interstate commerce transaction, nor was it a necessary incident to tbe carrying on of such commerce.
2. Tbat tbe contract, in so far as it involved such mill, was a contract relating to property within tbe state and was void under sec. 1770b, Stats.
By the Gourt. — Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.