State ex rel. Roddis Lumber & Veneer Co. v. Stauber
State ex rel. Roddis Lumber & Veneer Co. v. Stauber
Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed February 9, 1926:
Upon stipulation of the parties, the result in these two cases, the issues being the same, was to be that reached in the two cases of State ex rel. Park Falls L. Co. v. Stauber and State ex rel. Edward Hines H. & H. Co. v. Stauber, ante, p. 310, 207 N. W. 409.
By the Court. — Judgments reversed, and causes remanded for further proceedings according to law.
The respondent moved for a rehearing.
In support of the motion there was a brief by C. E. Lovett of Park Falls, attorney, and Bundy, Beach & Holland of Eau Claire, of counsel, the Attorney General and Frank
In opposition thereto there was a brief by W. K. Parkinson of Phillips, attorney, and William S. Bennet of Chicago and Olin & Butler of Madison, of counsel.
The motion was denied, with $25 costs, on June 21, 1926.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State ex rel. Roddis Lumber & Veneer Company v. Stauber, City Clerk, [Two cases.]
- Status
- Published