Landman v. Rashman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Landman v. Rashman, 195 Wis. 33 (Wis. 1928)
217 N.W. 649; 1928 Wisc. LEXIS 58
Vinje
Landman v. Rashman
Opinion of the Court
It will be observed that the order appealed from is not a final order in a contempt proceeding because it
The order appealed from is a contingent one, to become effective only in case there is a second refusal by defendant to answer the questions. The opportunity for a second refusal has not been afforded him and we cannot say what he would do if questioned again. To be appealable an order must finally dispose of the matter under consideration, not contingently merely.
By the Court. — Appeal dismissed.
Reference
- Status
- Published