Banking Commission v. Rothe
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman (Wis. 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The court is of the opinion that the bond of the respondent is not a sealed instrument, but is equally divided on the question of whether the action is one for relief on the ground of fraud. Mr. Justice Fowler, Mr. Justice Fritz, and Mr. Justice Martin are of the opinion that the action is one for relief on the ground of fraud, governed by sec. 330.19 (7), Stats., and that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice 'Wickhem, and the writer are of the contrary view and of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
Under the rule the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.