Stenicka v. Thomas

Wisconsin Supreme Court
Stenicka v. Thomas, 32 N.W.2d 220 (Wis. 1948)
252 Wis. 541; 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 303
PER CURIAM.

Stenicka v. Thomas

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon this appeal the members of the court are equally divided. Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fritz, and Mr. Justice Fairchild are of the view that the trial court’s findings of fact are not against the great *542 weight'and clear preponderance of the evidence and that therefore the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Wick-hem, Mr. Justice Barlow, and Mr. Justice Hughes are of the contrary view and are in favor of reversal of the judgment. This situation necessarily results in the affirmance of the Judgment. Zohrlaut v. Mengelberg, 148 Wis. 592, 134 N. W. 1135; Carpenter Baking Co. v. Bakery Union, 238 Wis. 367, 299 N. W. 30, 300 N. W. 225.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Will of Klofanda: Stenicka and Another, Appellants, vs. Thomas and Wife, Respondents
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published