Okimosh v. State
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Walker (Wis. 2006)
- Claybrooks v. State (Wis. 1971)
- State v. Charette (Wis. 1971)
- Davis v. State (Wis. 1970)
- Sartin v. State (Wis. 1969)
- State v. Escobedo (Wis. 1969)
- Gray v. State (Wis. 1968)
- Finger v. State (Wis. 1968)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Within one year after defendant’s conviction defense counsel failed to present a motion to the trial court to have a new trial or to have the verdict set aside because of the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support that verdict. We have held that failure to make such a motion at the trial court level bars the plaintiff in error from raising the question of the sufficient credible evidence produced at the trial in support of the verdict unless compelling circumstances exist which permit the question to be raised. 1 There are no compelling circumstances in this case that warrant an exception to this rule.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
State v. Van Beek (1966), 31 Wis. (2d) 51, 141 N. W. (2d) 873; State v. Thompson (1966), 31 Wis. (2d) 365, 142 N. W. (2d) 779.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.