Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1968

Lilley v. Par-Wis, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court · Decided January 30, 1968 · Wilkie

38 Wis. 2d 13; 155 N.W.2d 565; 1968 Wisc. LEXIS 868

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Hon. Charles E. Kading (Wis. 1975)
State v. Jerrell C.J. (Wis. 2005)
State v. Holmes (Wis. 1982)
In re Hon. Charles E. Kading (Wis. 1976)
Wagner v. Milwaukee County Election Commission (Wis. 2003)
Rainey v. State (Wis. 1974)
In Matter of Complaint Against Seraphim (Wis. 1980)
In re Van Susteren (Wis. 1978)
Estate of Philbrick (Wis. 1975)
Sturdevant v. State (Wis. 1970)
Deja v. State (Wis. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Wilkie, J.

The sole issue determinative of this appeal is whether there is an issue of fact that must be tried. To the defendant’s affidavit in support of the motion is appended a copy of the enrollment contract, dated January 6, 1966. This contract enrolled the daughter for the course commencing September 12th and continuing for 219 hours, representing a six-months’ course as defendant claims. On the other hand, the plaintiffs’ affidavit states that Peter Neu, on behalf of the school, represented to the plaintiffs that the course would be of nine-months’ duration. Plaintiffs present a student identification card which their daughter received showing that the attendance for the course was from September, 1966, to June, 1967, nine months. Thus there is at *15least one issue of fact for trial as to whether or not there was any misrepresentation of fact as to the length of the course. Summary judgment was properly denied.1

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Voysey v. Labisky (1960), 10 Wis. 2d 274, 103 N. W. 2d 9.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.