In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Radue
In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Radue
Opinion of the Court
On March 18, 1980, the following petition for voluntary revocation of license was filed by Roger Radue:
TO: The Honorable Justices Of The Supreme Court:
ROGER RADUE, Attorney At Law, hereby submits this as his Verified Petition to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin and states as follows:
1. This Petition for Revocation of License is freely and voluntarily rendered and that he has not been subjected to coercion or duress. Further, that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting this petition and further that he is aware that there is presently pending an investigation into allegations that he has been guilty of misconduct. Those specific allegations alleged are as follows:
That in the summer of 1977, Roger Radue (Respondent) was retained by William Hughes for the purpose of commencing a bankruptcy proceeding; that in August of 1977, Hughes endorsed over to Respondent a check from the Texaco Oil Company made payable to Hughes and
2. That he is aware that the investigative record will be filed with the Supreme Court as part of the record and he submits this petition because he knows that he cannot successfully defend against the above allegations and further that he waives his right to defend against these allegations.
Dated in Madison, Wisconsin, this 29th day of December, 1979.
On June 16, 1980, the following order of the court was entered:
A petition for voluntary revocation of license to practice law in Wisconsin having been filed on March 18, 1980, by Roger Radue, the court having referred the matter to the Hon. William C. Sachtjen, referee on March 24, 1980, and the referee having filed his disposition of the matter on June 2, 1980.
IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and the voluntary revocation of the petitioner’s license to practice law in Wisconsin is effective as of June 2, 1980.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner pay to the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility the costs of this proceeding in the amount of $336.50 within 30 days of the date of this order.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.