Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission
Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission
303 N.W.2d 668; 101 Wis. 2d 169; 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 263; 1981 Wisc. LEXIS 2723; 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,750; 30 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 410
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Estate of Szleszinski v. Labor & Industry Review Commission (Wis. 2007)
- Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman (Wis. 2017)
- Fore Way Express, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 1987)
- City of Onalaska v. State Labor & Industry Review Commission (Wis. Ct. App. 1984)
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Hoover (Pa. 2002)
- Tinjum v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (Wash. Ct. App. 2001)
- Tinjum v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (Wash. Ct. App. 2001)
- Murray v. Briggs (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
- Bothum v. State, Department of Transportation (Wis. Ct. App. 1986)
- Calumet County v. Labor & Industry Review Commission (Wis. Ct. App. 1984)
- Houslet v. Natural Resources Department (Wis. Ct. App. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The court is equally divided on the question of whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Justice Heffernan, Justice Day, and Justice Abrahamson would affirm; Justice Callow, *170 Justice Coffey, and Justice Steinmetz would reverse. Chief Justice Beilfuss did not participate.
Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.