Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1981

Herwig v. Enerson & Eggen

Wisconsin Supreme Court · Decided March 31, 1981 · Per Curiam

303 N.W.2d 669; 101 Wis. 2d 170; 1981 Wisc. LEXIS 2721 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman (Wis. 2017)
Kentucky National Insurance v. Lawrence (6th Cir. 2006)
City of Edgerton v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin (Wis. Ct. App. 1992)
Felder v. North River Insurance (Wis. Ct. App. 1988)
Richie Ex Rel. McManus v. American Family Mutual Insurance (Wis. Ct. App. 1987)
Scott v. AMER. STAND. INS. CO. OF WIS. (Wis. Ct. App. 1986)
Bradley Bank v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation, Defendant (7th Cir. 1984)
Kozak v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (Wis. Ct. App. 1984)
Hartland Cicero Mutual Insurance v. Elmer (Wis. Ct. App. 1984)
Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Guay (Wis. 1981)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed, Justice Callow, Justice Coffey and Justice Steinmetz being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed; Justice Heffernan, Justice Abrahamson and Justice Day being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed; and Chief Justice Beilfuss not having participated in this appeal. The decision is therefore affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.