In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hill
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lister (Wis. 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Attorney JAMES R. HILL. Case No. 88-0164-D
The referee filed a report on March 16, 1988 recommending that the petition of James R. Hill for the revocation of his license to practice law by consent, pursuant to SCR 21.10(1), be granted. Attorney Hill was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1969 and practiced in Appleton. He has not previously been the subject of an attorney disciplinary proceeding.
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for revocation of license by consent is granted and the license of James R. Hill to practice law in Wisconsin is revoked, effective the date of this order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days of the date of this order James R. Hill pay to the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility the costs of this disciplinary proceeding.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that James R. Hill comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin has been revoked.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.